Monthly Archives: April 2005

but it’s not as nice as looking in your eyes

He hefted the toaster to eye-level and exclaimed that it, in fact, was the lost toaster of Coco Vaehn. After then safely securing the toaster away somewhere the guests would never guess to look or even think to look, he … Continue reading →

version 1: Oh, come now, come now, you can’t possibly expect me to believe that– Relative to every other every, there’s a–there’s a– No, not at all–no, at all, no. Even when you can’t speak (especially when you can’t speak), … Continue reading →

The roadmap is as follows. To start off with, we motivate the need. We disprove the emulation of evolutionary programming. We now introduce an architecture for arguing that logic can be made permutable, amphibious, and electronic [13]. We believe that … Continue reading →

morning glories try to open wider than they should, but it’s too late

Probably, but I’m only saying probably, not surely or definitely or certainly or even absolutely, but probably right before the myoclonic jerk. All at once I was stumbling, falling, or similar and subsequently woke up again, safe, I suppose, by … Continue reading →

• How many Vikings can you fit in a barrel? • Depends on the size of the barrel. • . . . eh? • That partic’lar model’ll fitcha ’bout 75 to 100 full-size Vikings depending on howya stack ‘em. • … Continue reading →

Overt is maybe not the best way. Really, but subtlety is probably best left to the professionals. No one knows what you’re talking about. Even I know that vague ≠ ambiguous ≠ subtle. Really really, at one point I thought … Continue reading →